That card’s competitive with Nvidia’s older Maxwell GPU-based EVGA GTX 970 FTW. With AMD pushing DirectX 12 so hard, as it takes superb advantage of the dedicated async compute engine hardware inside Radeon graphics cards, testing the Polaris GPU-based $200 Radeon RX 480 was a no-brainer. We selected six cards to put Time Spy through its paces. Let’s see how several modern graphics cards compare in Time Spy. Likewise for a system with a high-end graphics card paired with an underpowered CPU.” For example, doubling the CPU speed in a system with an entry-level graphics card doesn’t help much in games since the system is already limited by the GPU. This reflects the reality of the user experience. Balanced in this sense means the Graphics and CPU test scores are roughly the same magnitude.įor a system where either the Graphics or CPU score is substantially higher than the other, the harmonic mean rewards boosting the lower score. “For a balanced system, the weights reflect the ratio of the effects of GPU and CPU performance on the overall score. So what does “weighted harmonic mean,” well, mean? Here’s how Futuremark describes it: Once everything’s done running, the CPU score and GPU score are combined to generate an overall score using a “weighted harmonic mean.” “The CPU test measures performance using a demanding combination of physics simulation, occlusion culling, and procedural generation,” Futuremark says. It features ice-like crystal clusters spreading throughout the screen using procedural generation, constantly transforming and growing. Then a third test hammers your CPU-the fans on our test system’s closed-looped cooler screamed during this section-while minimizing the GPU load. It “focuses more on ray-marched volume illumination with hundreds of shadowed and unshadowed spot lights.” The two graphics tests each receive separate scores, which are combined into an overall graphics score. The second graphics test pans and zooms throughout the same museum, showing different areas illuminated by different light sources than the first test. This first test “focuses more on rendering of transparent elements,” according to Futuremark. The first graphics test (pictured above) stars the titular time spy wandering through a museum that features artifacts and weapons from throughout time and space, complete with easter-egg-style nods to other 3DMark benchmarks and games like Halo, Far Cry, and Deus Ex. It starts off with two graphics-focused tests that stress your GPU in differing ways while minimizing the CPU load, to get as much of a pure GPU result as possible. Time Spy’s actually broken up into a trio of tests running at 2560×1440 resolution in the official benchmark configuration. Let’s take a deeper look at this new DirectX 12 benchmark, and the performance results for a range of AMD and Nvidia cards.
10K IN TIME SPY BENCHMARK UPGRADE
But if you buy before July 23 you’ll be able to upgrade for $5 or buy the complete Advanced Edition for $10.įuturemark provided PCWorld early access to Time Spy to see how it handles. If you already own 3DMark Advanced Edition, you can purchase Time Spy separately for $10.
The paid-for Advanced Edition of 3DMark (which offers additional features and benchmarks) is rising in price from $25 to $30 thanks to Time Spy’s inclusion, however.
10K IN TIME SPY BENCHMARK DOWNLOAD
(You can download it on Futuremark’s site or by clicking the Download demo button on 3DMark’s Steam page.) Time to start your engines, folks-at least if you have Windows 10.
10K IN TIME SPY BENCHMARK FREE
More on those in a bit.īetter yet: Time Spy’s coming to all versions of 3DMark, including the Basic Edition that’s free for personal, noncommercial use. And it lets you test with asynchronous compute both enabled and disabled, which leads to some interesting insights.
0 kommentar(er)
